This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of apply.

Fallout four is a great game. Information technology'southward got amend gunplay and action than whatever previous modern Fallout, a decent crafting system, streamlined skills and talents, and an evocative setting. The landscapes and environments are gorgeous, even if the character models are lacking. There's a lot to like about this game — but information technology's a terrible RPG.

What'southward an RPG?

Strip away the tropes and conventions of the genre and there are ii linked characteristics common to all role playing games (RPGs) — a (hopefully) potent story, and the opportunity to make meaningful choices that influence how the game's narrative evolves. Some games play out the same way but permit the gamer to choose different play styles, while others let the role player to directly shape the narrative.

Because game assets and evolution time are both scarce resources, the best RPGs developers are skilled illusionists. Quest lines, conversation threads, and plot-specific developments are often woven in ways that give players plenty freedom to explore alternative narratives while minimizing the amount of overhead required to do so. In Fallout: New Vegas, you can cull to stand with Mr. House, New Vegas, the NCR, or Caesar's Legion. What you lot can't exercise is decide that the Mojave is really tedious, and yous'd really prefer to come across what the Baja Peninsula is like 200 years after the bombs roughshod.

FNV-Brown

Fallout New Vegas: A study in brown

RPGs are the only popular game type whose abridgement tells you lot nothing almost how you play the title. Every other abbreviation — FPS, RTS, plough-based, third-person shooter — is designed to explain how the player experiences the game. All of these game types are potentially compatible with the characterization "RPG."

Where Fallout 4 falls brusque

Warning: Spoilers beyond this bespeak.

There'due south infamous bad blood between fans of the first two Fallout games, which were isometric turn-based titles, and gamers who discovered the series with Fallout three / Fallout: New Vegas. I'm one of the latter type — while I've been playing PC games since the mid-1980s, Fallout and Fallout 2 didn't make information technology on to my radar for whatever reason back when they were new. My kickoff exposure to the serial was with Fallout 3 and while I've tried to dive back into the earlier games, I've had trouble switching dorsum to turn-of-the-century gameplay and UI designs.

I bring this up to make it clear that I'm comparing FO4 to its immediate predecessors, not kickstarting an ancient debate over the direction Bethesda took the series.

Fallout iv has ii problems that mutually reinforce each other. Throughout the first part of the game, the overarching goal is to find the son stolen from y'all while you were trapped in cryogenic stasis. Once you find him, you lot discover he'southward the leader of the evil Institute, a secretive organization whose artificial humans (called synths) have been replacing humans in key positions of power for years, if non several decades.

FO4-institute-concourse

The Constitute

How yous play Fallout iv is largely determined by how you lot view synths and the question of artificial consciousness. In theory, this could accept been an amazing plot. 1 of your companions in Fallout 4, Nick Valentine, is a synth with the transplanted mind of a police officer who was killed just before the Great War erupted. He openly questions whether or non he actually exists, or if he'due south just a shadow, a copy of a man 200 years expressionless.

Nick-Valentine

One of the factions in the game, the Railroad, passionately believes that synths are people, first and foremost. Most of the other factions come across them as a unsafe, evenly deadly, invasion force. The Establish maintains that synths are robots, incapable of any kind of idea.

Fallout four presents you with plenty of evidence that the Institute is wrong, and most no data to suggest they might be right. The game never explains why they believe synths are just robots, nor why the Institute is replacing human beings with synthetics in the first place. It's loosely implied that the Plant believes human beings tin can't be fixed and that the solution is to "redefine" mankind — one of your companions, X6-88, openly states that things will be improve once all the humans living above ground (the Institute is beneath the ruins of the alternating-universe MIT, dubbed the Republic Institute of Applied science) are expressionless and gone.

The game doesn't explain why the Institute has been creating Super Mutants with Fallout'southward Forced Evolutionary Virus, why the Institute believes that communities of humans who survived a nuclear state of war are going to whorl over and die at some point in the near futurity. There's no word on the nature of synth consciousness that would prove the Institute is correct.

Every bit the player, y'all come across diverse types of synth, with early models clearly robotic and the later designs indistinguishable from humans, but you lot never have the opportunity to question them or gather data to make an informed decision. The Fallout games use final entries to give you disquisitional backstory and information, simply data on these critical bug is almost entirely missing.

The mastermind behind the Institute, but he calls you Dad.

The mastermind behind the Institute, but he calls you Dad.

If y'all back the Institute, you lot exercise so out of perceived loyalty to your son, a man decades older than you, whom you lot didn't enhance and haven't met. That's despite the fact that he leads an organization that'southward guilty of mass murder and (arguably) slavery.

The second trouble with Fallout 4 is that while you lot tin can choose which faction yous side with, the entire game boils downwardly to ane of two, most identical endings — the Nuclear Family unit, or the Nuclear Option. While the game'south final quests play out somewhat differently depending on which faction you choose, there are just ii endings. Neither explains anything most what happened to the Commonwealth after the events of Fallout 4. Your friends, companions, and the settlements you visited — y'all observe out nothing nearly how the choices you fabricated will shape the Wasteland in the future. Mamma Murphy will nowadays you with a few vague lines of vision if yous visit her after the game ends, and Piper might write a newspaper story. That'southward it.

Development or abandonment?

Fallout 4 does a lot of things right. The early on Deathclaw encounter is fabulous. The gunplay and exploration are both great. Re-imagining Ghouls equally fast zombies was a bright twist.

Ghouls are less oozy and more leathery in FO4. As zomibe analogs, they're terrifying for low-level characters.

Ghouls are less oozy and more than leathery in FO4. As zomibe analogs, they're terrifying for depression-level characters.

Often, however, Fallout 4 feels similar it doesn't quite know what it wants to be. It nails the first-person shooter aspects better than either FO3 or FNV, but the game suffers from a lack of focus. It has a settlement mini-game wedged in, despite a poor UI and limited construction options (I mostly gave up on settlements in one case I realized at that place's no fashion to actually build things out of new material. Evidently no 1 in the Commonwealth actually cares if houses accept walls or not).

Some of your companions, like Nick Valentine, Cait, MacCready, and Curie, have compelling side quests of their own. Others, like Strong, Preston Garvey, X6-88, and fifty-fifty Codsworth oft feel tacked-on. I experimented in Fallout four by often taking companions to areas of the Republic I thought they'd be interested in or have special dialog triggers when visiting. More often than not, I was disappointed.

Fallout four'due south junk collection and settlement game are meant to give players an intriguing new way to spend fourth dimension in-universe, only I found the countless scrap collecting quickly wears thin — and you lot'll demand to collect bit if you desire to tramp around in power armor on a regular footing. More than annihilation, it highlights the fact that the FO4 world is essentially static. No one writes new music. There are few farms and settlements before you make it on the scene, and no infrastructure. No sawmills, no granaries, no glass blowers or potters or independent craftsman. Culture, such as it is, is frozen in the Pre-war epoch, with a literal 50s biker gang roaming the southeast Commonwealth.

Fallout4-Yangtze

One quest in FO4 takes you to this submarine (h2o effects disabled to show the sub design, which is why there are upside downwardly boats floating nearby

Crafting is meant to give you lot a way to expand your character, merely FO4's system often highlights its own baroque nature. To give yous an idea how ridiculous this is, there are craftable recipes in FO4 that require dirty water. All of the water in the Commonwealth is dirty by default. However you lot tin't produce dirty water by putting a bucket under a faucet. I can't help thinking this is a limit of continuing to employ the same Creation Engine that powered last-gen games — information technology clearly wasn't designed to allow for flexible crafting.

Enough of games require you to mine or notice components for crafting, but Fallout 4 buries you under an accented barrage of junk. The longer I played, the more than I constitute myself wondering how any of this stuff could still exist, given that settlers plain required information technology for all the aforementioned things I did, all the same had no means of producing it themselves.

FO4 beauty

Fallout 4 is gorgeous if y'all catch it right

FPS games can become away with this kind of flat, two-dimensional environment because they typically aren't designed for depth. Equally I said in the outset, all RPGs are illusions — digital stagecraft, with erstwhile terminals and forgotten tomes continuing in for the long-ago characters and events they chronicle. In Fallout 4'southward example, the pigment has begun to flake; the 50s shtick and eternal, frozen society in which everyone has more-or-less forgotten how to make things is wearing thin.

There are hints of brilliance in Fallout iv's narrative and setting. It'due south just a shame that they aren't more than hints. It's a neat first-person shooter and I'm excited to encounter what modders tin do with information technology once the GECK is released, but if this is the direction future games will take, I'yard going to accept a difficult time getting interested in the future of the franchise. FO3 and FNV may not accept satisfied fans of the first two games, but they built interesting worlds in their ain right. Fallout 4 raises great questions, only and so forgets to answer them.